Friday, November 21, 2014

Excavation and Footings

              On October 30 the heavy equipment arrived to begin the excavation.  It was finished on November 5.

Notes regarding the construction camera: I changed the exposure rate several times in an attempt to find the best way to document the process.  I ended up with more exposures per minute, a five-second interval. I deleted early morning and late afternoon times when nothing significant was happening in order to shorten the film. I also had to move the camera as excavation continued.

A link to the construction camera footage of the excavation is here:



The footing subcontractor pronounced the excavation a success.  The maximum deviation from the desired elevation was less than 1.5 inches.


               Once the excavation was finished it was time for the installation of the FastFoot forms.  The final design of the foundation included 36” wide footings, 12” deep, on the west side and 30” wide footings, 12” deep, for the remainder of the foundation.   The thicker west footing was required because there is a stud wall inside the SCIPS wall on that side.  We decided to add 6” in width on portions of the south in order to support the deck; our goal is to support the deck as an independent structure rather than using the SCIPS wall as a structural member.

                Basic information on the FastFoot system can be found here:

               This video gives an overview of the setup and concrete placement*:

                The finished FastFoot fabric, bracing and penetrations before placement of the concrete: 

Warning:  Wide angle lenses make straight lines look curved!!

East side from the north



 West side from the north



Transition from 36" to 30" footing


Footing penetration detail:  radon mitigation

Close-up of Radon mitigation pipe


                The pour in process:
Beginning of the pour

Screeding

Final level check

              
  Completed footings:

 From the northwest

North side from the west with shear wall

Mudroom from the north

Center of the south wall

Sanitary line on south side


                The verdict from the subcontractor:  once they have worked their way through the learning curve it will be quicker than the standard dug footings.  Setup takes some time but it's easier dealing with the rebar when everything is above ground. 

Three notes for future reference if anyone is interested in using FastFoot: 
1.       Stanley, the subcontractor, said that he originally underestimated the amount of concrete necessary.  It bulges out below the bracing (FastFoot's technical term is apparently "pooching out") so he said that you need to calculate the concrete needed based on the outside of the 2 x 4 bracing, not the inside dimensions.
2.       They ran into one problem close to the end, when the final 2 x 4 (you might know it!) twisted off the bracing.  They were able to get everything back level by using leverage to move it back into place and then adding additional bracing.  The FastFoot installation instructions tell you to use two nails, at different angles, to hold the bracing.  He used three:  one double-headed scaffold nail and two ring-shank nails.  After talking to Alton it looks like one nail at the center of the bracing and a hex-head screw at the top might be a better solution:  the screw would be stronger than the nail at preventing twisting and would be easier to remove.
3.       Alton noted that contractors who are interested in using the FastFoot system on an ongoing basis might want to investigate metal stakes such as these:  http://www.marshallstamping.com/nail_stakes.html  They are reusable and penetrate the ground much easier than wooden stakes.



*             In most cases I have deleted long stretches of inactivity.  However, in this case I preserved the two-hour wait for the concrete truck in order to give a true sense of the day’s flow.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Background on the project

                The project:  We wanted a retirement home after traveling  full-time in an RV for ten years.  Our travels covered all of the lower 48 states and we considered many possible retirement locations.  However, when it was time for a decision we ended up back in northeast Georgia where I grew up, not far north of Atlanta where we worked before retirement.

                The building lot:  In 2010 we bought ten acres in a rural setting 70 miles northeast of Atlanta.  We wanted a place accessible to Atlanta:  google maps would have one believe that it is a hour trip to I-285, Atlanta’s perimeter highway. The land is heavily forested with very little underbrush.  It is accessed by a private road, shared by six families.  An old logging road, probably dating back to the 1930s, leads from the private road to near the logical home site.  There is a mix of pine, oak and hickory trees, with an understory of dogwoods, native blueberries, scuppernongs and a scattering of native azaleas.  The natural place for the house is in a small draw which faces directly south.     Higher ground to the north and west, combined with the heavy tree cover, provides protection against the summer sun.  Since a portion of the forest is deciduous we can still benefit from the winter sun.

Open Mixed Forest



Future Driveway


Future Home Site

                Our initial work on the property involved cutting trees for the driveway, clearing and fencing a garden/orchard and locating the best site for the house.  By June 2011 we had a driveway, well, septic system and power and were able to bring the RV to the property for the first time.  It was time to turn to designing the house.

Grading the driveway


Finishing the driveway



Drilling the well



The RV onsite for the first time




               Design parameters:  We wanted a small home with everything we need on the main floor, handicapped accessible for step-free living.  We wanted a walkout basement which could function as a caretaker apartment so that we could ‘age in place’ a bit easier when the time comes.  We also wanted a loft for additional sleeping space and a workroom.   The detached garage would be to the east and we would enter through a mudroom. Design, both in terms of the interior and the exterior, would focus on low maintenance.  Given the lay of the land and the house site we wanted the dining room on the east, for sunlight with our morning coffee.  The kitchen would be central to the open floor plan and the living room would be to the west.   The open floor plan would have lots of windows facing south, with a deck on that side as well.  That left the north side of the house for the master bedroom, bath and closet. The house would be energy-efficient, designed to maximize solar heating in the winter and minimize it in the summer.  We would look for a super-insulated, tight envelope with high-performance windows and lots of thermal mass.  The roof design would need to facilitate either solar hot water or photo-voltaic panels.  We plan to continue to travel in the RV, especially in the winter, so the house should require minimal energy when we are not home.   There should be minimal wood in the project, since all the downed trees on the property are infested with termites.   We wanted to keep as many trees as possible around the homesite.
The key to the design process happened early in the process.  I had been looking at farmhouses, taking pictures of designs I liked and researching the historical origins of the local farmhouses.  I was really taken with the idea of building a modern version of a dogtrot cabin.  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogtrot_house)  The Chair of the Design Committee brought me back to reality: “You keep looking at farmhouses but we don’t own a farm.  We have trees so you need to start  thinking about treehouses.”

                The local climate:  although most would think of north Georgia as a cooling-dominated climate the local data does not support that:   Annual heating degree days over the last three years show an average of 3360 HDD and a high of 3864 HDD, last winter.  Cooling degree days averaged 1551 CDD with a high of 1705 CDD over the same period.  Since we do not plan to spend all winter in the house our concern is primarily with cooling the home.  (Data from http://www.degreedays.net/)

                The process: We took several years to investigate options for the building envelope, windows and other basic details.  We looked at options ranging from totally new concepts to double-stud walls to SIPS and SCIPS.  Visited window dealers, read everything we could get our hands on.  Alton Keown, who came onboard early in the process, was of invaluable assistance in working our way through the possibilities.

                The decisions:  We settled on



        The team:

Builder:  Larry Stouffer,
LVS Green Builders, Inc.
Dahlonega GA
706.864.0790

Architecture and Space Planning:
Architect:  Joe Martin, LEED AP, Assoc. AIA   
Happy Baker
Chattanooga, TN
423.664.3970
423.664.3525


Design:
Judith Rickard, ASID
Phoenix, AZ
jdrickard@cox.net 
602.268.0365

Gulf Concrete Technology
Scott Miller,   technical advisor/sales  
smiller@gctm2.com
904.742.4175

Structural Engineer:   Baku Patel, PE LEED AP
baku.patel@pecga.com

Jr. Structural Engineer:  Srikanth Bajaj, EIT
srikanth.bajaj@pecga.com

Palmer Engineering Company
3581 Habersham at Northlake, Building M
Tucker, Georgia 30084
www.PalmerEngineeringCompany.com
770.908.9908

Construction Technology Consultant:   Alton Keown
Auburn, AL
keownac@auburn.edu
334.826.3979